Author: stopdiablocanyon_ls4xz0

  • The false promise of nuclear power

    The false promise of nuclear power

    The Lancet ‍|‍ ‍By Philip J Landrigan and Brita E Lundberg

    By focusing narrowly on reactor operations, portraying reactor hazards as “extremely small”, and ignoring nuclear energy’s other dangers, Talha Burki’s World Report supports the mendacious narrative that nuclear power is a “safe, clean, and affordable” solution to both rising electricity demand and climate change.

  • Trump says a nuclear renaissance is coming. The deals aren’t.

    Trump says a nuclear renaissance is coming. The deals aren’t.

    The Washington Post | By Evan Halper

    Behind flashy announcements and surging AI power needs, few agreements to actually produce power get inked.

  • Federal nuclear agency moves to relax radiation exposure rules

    Federal nuclear agency moves to relax radiation exposure rules

    The Washington Post | By Evan Halper

    The proposed change, which would end a requirement that plants limit workers’ radiation exposure to “as low as reasonably achievable,” has alarmed nuclear safety advocates.

  • Climate change matters

    Climate change matters

    BeyondNuclearInternational.org |‍ By Diane Curran

    Environmental laws should be adhered to not abolished, says Diane Curran. For 45 years, I have represented environmental organizations and state and local governments in US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing and enforcement proceedings, as well as in federal court. Today, more than ever, we need to talk about climate change.

  • Press Alert: NRC Bypasses Independent Safety Review for Diablo Canyon, Raising Public Safety Concerns

    Press Alert: NRC Bypasses Independent Safety Review for Diablo Canyon, Raising Public Safety Concerns

    MothersForPeace.org |‍ By Molly Johnson

    San Luis Obispo, CA — The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s decision to exempt Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) from a review by the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) as part of Diablo Canyon’s license renewal process—on its own initiative—is reckless, unjustified, and dangerous.

  • Don’t let Diablo Canyon jump the guardrails

    Don’t let Diablo Canyon jump the guardrails

    New Times |‍ By Gianna Patchen and Andrew Christie

    The Diablo Canyon Power Plant was supposed to close last year. Now the five-year extension that kept the plant open may become a 20-year extension. Over the past few months, the San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors and several local city councils with an eye on tax revenues have been urging state legislators to extend Diablo’s life all the way to 2045. Now would be a good time to revisit the serious questions about Diablo Canyon’s continued operation.

  • Risky Business Continues at Diablo Canyon

    Risky Business Continues at Diablo Canyon

    CounterPunch.org | By Greg M. Schwartz

    Independent experts have deemed the aging Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant unsafe & unneeded, so why are Uncle Sam & California so intent on gambling to keep it open?

  • California taxpayers gave PG&E a huge, supposedly safe loan. The losses are already mounting.

    California taxpayers gave PG&E a huge, supposedly safe loan. The losses are already mounting.

    CalMatters.org |‍ By Malena Carollo

    Gov. Gavin Newsom assured lawmakers federal funds would eventually cover a $1.4 billion loan to keep the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant open. They could fall $588 million short.

  • When you combine AI and nuclear power, the results can be catastrophic

    When you combine AI and nuclear power, the results can be catastrophic

    The Hill | By Linda Parks

    The recent news that Microsoft has made a deal to restart the Three Mile Island Nuclear Power Plant to run its AI data centers brings together two technologies that have each been described as having the potential for a “nuclear-level catastrophe.”


    Putting aside whether AI is mature enough to be feeding it with astronomical amounts of our energy supplies, powering it with renewable energy is critical for our energy future and safety.


    Mark Jacobson, director of Stanford’s atmosphere and energy program, finds that “Every dollar spent on nuclear is one less dollar spent on clean renewable energy and one more dollar spent on making the world a comparatively dirtier and more dangerous place, because nuclear power and nuclear weapons go hand in hand.”